Petitioner withdrew writ petition on instructions. The court disposed of the petition as withdrawn without costs.
Disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 4335.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 4335 OF 2016
Vishwambhar Amrutrao Kokil .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri Y. P. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. B. Yawalkar, Addl.G.P. for the Respondent No. 1. Shri P. D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE : 03RD AUGUST, 2018.
FINAL ORDER :
. The learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
[SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
bsb/Aug. 18
Vishwambhar Amrutrao Kokil
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
Sunil K. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
