This bench allowed the civil application to condone the delay in restoring a writ petition previously dismissed due to non-removal of office objections. The applicant was granted two weeks to remove these objections.
Civil application allowed; delay condoned; writ petition restored subject to removal of office objections within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
30 CAW 335.18.doc
1
P.H.Jayani
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 335 OF 2018 IN REJECTED CASE NO. 2407 OF 2017
….Applicant
Maruti Laxman Kene ….Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents
Mr. Tanaji Mhatugade for the applicant. Mr. P.G. Sawant – AGP for the State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE AND SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATE : 12th FEBRUARY, 2018
P.C. :
P.H.Jayani 2 30 CAW 335.18.doc
The learned counsel for the applicant states that he will remove all the office objections within a period of two weeks. Statement is accepted.
(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the civil application for restoration of the dismissed writ petition should be condoned.
P.H. Jayani
State of Maharashtra
ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI
RANJIT MORE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
