One judge ordered restoration of the writ petition to the file and allowed the civil application in the prayer clauses; the other judge did not write a reasoned opinion as she had no independent opinion.
The writ petition stands restored to the file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 276 OF 2018 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 10854 OF 2017
Dwarkanath Namdev Patil. ..Applicant. In the matter Between
Dwarkanath Namdev Patil.
..Petitioner.
Versus
The Ministry of Revenue and Forest Department, State of Maharashtra and Others. ..Respondents.
Mr. Ashish P. Giri for the Applicant. Mr. V. S. Gokhale, AGP for the Respondent-State.
Coram : RANJIT MORE & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. Date : February 9, 2018 .
P. C. :
[SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.]
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
1 / 1
patilsr
Dwarkanath Namdev Patil
The Ministry of Revenue and Forest Department, State of Maharashtra
RANJIT MORE
ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
