Rajen B Purohit v. Bharati H Shah and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge allowed a criminal application for withdrawal of deposited amount and disposed of the matter without reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ISM
1 18.130.18 appr
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 130 OF 2018 IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 615 OF 2017
Rajen B Purohit .....Applicant
V/s.
Bharati H Shah and Anr ....Respondents
Mr. Rahul Karnik for the applicant. Mr. H. J. Dedhiya APP for the State.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : MARCH 21, 2018.
P.C.
This is an application for withdrawal of the amount deposited by the accused. For the reasons disclosed, application stands
allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
2 Application stands disposed of.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
Rajen B Purohit
Bharati H Shah and Anr
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court