The High Court allowed a criminal application as previous facts were identical to a disposed order dated 07/11/2017, relying on reasons disclosed therein for the relief sought.
Allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ISM
1 34.396.17 apl
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 396 OF 2017
The Director, M/s. Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.
.....Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra
....Respondent
Ms. Kirti Parekh i/b Mr. Ashwin Sakolkar for the applicant. Mrs. S. S. Kaushik APP for the State.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. DATE : MARCH 21, 2018.
P.C.
The facts of the present case is identical to the one decided in
Criminal Application No. 2899 of 2017 vide Judgment and Order dated 07/11/2017.
07/11/2017, present application stands allowed in terms of prayer
clause (a).
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
The Director, M/s. Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
