This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ISM
1 18.120.18 appr
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 120 OF 2018 IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 615 OF 2017
Bharti H. Shah
.....Applicant
V/s.
Rajen B Purohit and Anr ....Respondents
Mr. Tejas Kansavlikar for the applicant. Mr. H. J. Dedhiya APP for the State.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. DATE : MARCH 21, 2018.
P.C.
Since the Revision is already admitted, amount of Rs. 2,60,000/- of compensation deposited in this Court. For the reasons disposed in the application, application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
2 Application stands disposed of.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
Bharti H. Shah
Rajen B Purohit
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
