Supreme Court bail application withdrawn by applicant/accused without arguing merits. Single judge disposed of the matter as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903-APPA-1744-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1744 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1077 OF 2017
SANJAY MARUTI JADHAV AND ANR. ) ... APPELLANTS
V/S.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ) ... RESPONDENT
Mr.Keshav Chavan, Advocate for the Appellants.
Mr.A.R.Kapadnis, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 9th FEBRUARY 2018.
P.C. :
1 The learned APP submits that he is not informed as to whether the State is challenging the impugned judgment and order by filing an appeal.
1/2
avk
903-APPA-1744-2017
2 The learned Advocate appearing for the
applicant/accused without arguing the matter on merits, seeks permission to withdraw the application for bail.
3 The application is, as such, disposed of as withdrawn.
(A.M.BADAR J.)
2/2
avk
SANJAY MARUTI JADHAV AND ANR.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
A.M. BADAR J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
