Criminal Appeal regarding a bail application was dismissed as the applicant failed to appear on multiple dates and the court recorded his lack of interest in prosecuting the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(17)APPANo.1282017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.128 OF 2017 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.73 OF 2017
Ganesh Subhash Gaikwad
... Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
None for the Applicant.
Mr.S.V.Gavand, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 8th FEBRUARY 2018.
P.C. :
1 On 10th January 2018 as well as on 24th January 2018, none appeared for the applicant/accused to work out this application. On 24/01/2018, due to absence of the learned Advocate for the applicant/accused as a last chance, the application was adjourned to 8th February 2018.
2 Today also, none appeared for the applicant. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the instant application.
3 The application is, therefore, rejected for want of prosecution.
1/1
Gaikwad RD
Ganesh Subhash Gaikwad
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
