The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking quashment of proceedings. Held that since the private complainant had died, the proceedings had abated and nothing survived for consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 919 OF 2010
Rajni Parikh and Another. ..Petitioners. Versus Navin Hariram Somaiya & Another. ..Respondents.
Mr. Manoj J. Bhatt for the Petitioner. Mr. A. R. Kapadnis, APP for the State.
Coram : Ranjit More & Smt. S. S. Jadhav, JJ. Date : September 15, 2017 .
P. C. :
1 / 2
patilsr
[Smt. S. S. JADHAV, J.]
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
2 / 2
patilsr
Rajni Parikh
Navin Hariram Somaiya
Ranjit More
S. S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
