Petitioners in a writ petition challenging police disciplinary orders against a retired officer. The High Court noted the petitioner's non-appearance and that the respondent had already suffered the punishment, resulting in disposal of the petition.
The writ petition was disposed of as nothing survived for consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1294 OF 2010
Sanjeev Chandrakant Dighe and Another. Versus State of Maharashtra & Others.
..Petitioners.
..Respondents.
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. A. R. Kapadnis, APP for the State. Ms. Manjiri Parasnis for Respondent No. 4.
Coram : Ranjit More & Smt. S. S. Jadhav, JJ. Date : September 15, 2017 .
P. C. :
[Smt. S. S. JADHAV, J.]
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
1 / 1
patilsr
Sanjeev Chandrakant Dighe and Another
State of Maharashtra
Respondent No. 4
Ranjit More
S. S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
