Writ petition dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the petitioner at both morning and second calls, with no advocate appearing on their behalf.
Writ petition dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2842 OF 2009
Dr. Anilkumar Khandelwal and Others. ..Petitioners. Versus Mr. Dhiren K. Mehta & Another. ..Respondents.
None for the Petitioner. Mr. Y. M. Nakhwa, APP for the State.
Coram : Ranjit More & Smt. S. S. Jadhav, JJ. Date : September 15, 2017 .
P. C. :
[Smt. S. S. JADHAV, J.]
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
1 / 1
patilsr
Dr. Anilkumar Khandelwal and Others
Mr. Dhiren K. Mehta
Ranjit More
Smt S S Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
