Dismissed
Vinod Ramchandraro Kanhegaonkar v. Maharashtra Gramin Bank and Others
Bombay HCWP/9077/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
WP 9077/14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.9077/2014
Vinod Ramchandraro Kanhegaonkar..
...Petitioner..
Versus
Maharashtra Gramin Bank & others.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri S.V. Kurundkar, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri M.M. Patil Beedkar, Advocate for respondent nos.1 to
3.
.....
CORAM: SHANTANU S. KEMKAR &
NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ.
DATE: 22.08.2017
ORDER :
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to
withdraw the petitioner. The prayer is accepted. The
petition is disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
ndk/ c2281715.doc
Vinod Ramchandraro Kanhegaonkar
Maharashtra Gramin Bank & others
Shantanu S. Kemkar
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court