Petitioner withdrew writ petition with liberty to challenge adverse orders. Court directed authority to consider a Division Bench judgment if no decision is taken.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to challenge adverse orders and direction to authority to consider prior precedent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp10471.17
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.10471 OF 2017
Ganesh S/o Vasant Firke ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Mah. & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Ms Surekha Mahajan, Advocate for petitioner; Mr A.R. Kale, A.G.P. for respondents no.1 to 4
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ.
DATE : 22ndt August, 2017
P.C.
After arguing at length, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order as may be passed and, if the same is adverse to the interest of the petitioner, by way of appropriate proceedings.
wp10471.17 (2)
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
amj
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Smt. Munoli Rajashri Karabassappa vs. State of MaharashtraReferred¶14
Smt. Munoli Rajashri Karabassappa vs. State of Maharashtra through Secretary & ors.
Ganesh S/o Vasant Firke
The State of Mah.
Shantanu S. Kemkar
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
