The High Court at Aurangabad allowed and disposed of Civil Application No.5476/2017 in Writ Petition No.3364/2016. The court granted the applicant a liberty to file reply following respondents' rejoinder.
Application allowed and disposed of; liberty granted to respondent to file reply and rejoinder within specified periods.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CA 5476/17 in WP 3364/16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVILAPPLICATION NO.5476/2017
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.3364/2016
Jayabai Narayan Randive.
...Applicant..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri V.D. Gunale, Advocate for applicant.
Smt.M.A. Deshpande, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 4.
Shri A.N. Sabnis, Advocate for respondent no.5.
Shri K.G. Ghute Patil, Advocate for respondent no.6
served.
.....
CORAM: SHANTANU S. KEMKAR &
NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ.
DATE: 22.08.2017
ORDER :
1]On due consideration and for the reasons stated in
the civil application, the same is allowed and disposed
of.
2]Shri K.G. Ghute Patil, learned counsel appearing for
the respondent no.6 seeks liberty to file reply to the
petition. The prayer is accepted. Reply be filed in the
CA 5476/17 in WP 3364/16
office during the course of the day. Rejoinder, if any,
be filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks.
3]S.O. to 19.9.2017.
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
ndk/ c2281713.doc
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil application filed by the applicant should be allowed.
Jayabai Narayan Randive
State of Maharashtra
others
SHANTANU S. KEMKAR
NITIN W. SAMBRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court