This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp9022.17
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 9022 OF 2017
THE VILLAGE PANCHAYAT SONARI THROUGH ITS GRAMSEVAK AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Office Notes,Office MemorandaCourt's or Judge's orders
of Coram,appearances, Court's
orders or directions andCORAM : R.M. BORDE &
Registrar's ordersS.M. GAVHANE, JJ.
DATED : 14.08.2017
Mr.N.V.Gaware,Advocate for petitioners.
Ms.S.S.Raut, A.G.P. for respondent/
State.
Mr.P.P. Chavan, Advocate for R-2.
1.Learned Counsel appearing for
the petitioner states that by passage
of time, the petition is rendered
infructuous.
2.Thewritpetitionis
accordingly disposed of.
[S.M.GAVHANE,J.] [R.M.BORDE,J.]
snk/2017/AUG17/ wp9022.17
The Village Panchayat Sonari Through Its Gramsevak and Others
The State of Maharashtra and Others
R.M. Borde
S.M. Gavhane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court