The High Court disposed of a contempt petition. Counsel for the respondent Zilha Parishad informed that the court's earlier directive regarding salary difference would be complied with within two months, redressing the petitioner's grievance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
956 CONT. PETITION NO. 135 OF 2017
IN WP/1477/2016
RAMESH MADHAVRAO DODE
VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. S.C. Yeramwar AGP for Respondents: Mr.A.V.Deshmukh Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Mr. E.G. Irale h/f Mr. C.D. Biradar
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & S. M. GAVHANE, JJ. Dated: August 11, 2017
PER COURT :-
1 Learned counsel appearing for Zilha Parishad has placed on record the order issued on 10.8.2017, holding the petitioner entitled to receive the salary in the pay scale, prescribed for the post of Assistant Teacher. Copy of the order is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.
2 Counsel for Zilha Parishad states, on instructions, that the difference in the amount of salary, as directed by this Court earlier, would be paid within a period of two months from today. The submission is accepted.
3 In view of the above, the grievance raised by the petitioner, in the instant Contempt petition stands redressed.
( S. M. GAVHANE, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
RAMESH MADHAVRAO DODE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R. M. BORDE
S. M. GAVHANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
