Disposed

Kamladevi Nandlal Rathi and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC14 Aug 2017WP/8538/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners challenged encroachments along D.P. road. Municipal Council admitted encroachment and gave undertaking to remove it in 30 days with police protection. Court discharged petitioners.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners discharged; Municipal Council undertaking recorded; State directed to provide police force for encroachment removal upon request by Chief Officer.

Kamladevi Nandlal Rathi and Others Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

( 1 ) wp8538.16

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 8538 OF 2016

¶4

Kamladevi Nandlal Rathi & Ors.

¶5

..Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

¶8

..Respondents

¶9

Mr.S.P. Brahme, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr.S.B. Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for respondent/State.
Mr.D.S. Bagul, Advocate for respondent No.3.

¶10

CORAM : R.M. BORDE &
S.M.GAVHANE,JJ.
DATED :14.08.2017

¶11

P.C. :-

¶12

1.Heard. It is categorically admitted by the

¶13

Municipal Council that there exists encroachment along

¶14

side of D.P. road and said encroachment needs to be

¶15

removed. An undertaking is presented by the Chief
Officer, Municipal Council, Shirpur, undertaking to

¶16

remove encroachment by observing the procedure prescribed

¶17

in law within 30 days from today. The undertaking is

¶18

taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The
Chief Officer makes request for issuance of directions to

¶19

the State to provide adequate police protection for

¶20

taking measures for removal of encroachment.

¶21

2.Considering the request, the respondent-State

¶22

and the Superintendent of Police, Dhule, are directed to

¶23

provide adequate police force for undertaking the drive
of removal of encroachment, as and when the Chief Officer

¶24

makes request in that regard.

¶25

3.In view of above, the writ petition stands

¶26

disposed of.

¶27

[S.M.GAVHANE,J.] [R.M.BORDE,J.]

¶28

snk/2017/AUG17/ wp8538.16

Kamladevi Nandlal Rathi and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamladevi Nandlal Rathi and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mangalbai Jeevanrao Shivgan and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Ramesh Madhavrao Dode Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

M.I.D.C. Thr Its Regional Manager, Latur Vs Nagnath Nama Maske and Anr.

Rajaram Pralhad Adbane Vs Madansing Shivlal Ghusinge and Others

Kashinath Gopinath Sunepwad Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

The Village Panchayat Sonari through Its Gramsevak and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others