A petition was dismissed as infructuous because the trial court had acquitted the petitioner, rendering the writ petition unnecessary.
The writ petition is disposed off as it has become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Rane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 709 OF 2003
Shri. Haridas Gopal Shukla …..Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra and Ors. …..Respondents
Mr. Uday Warunjikar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. N.S. Jain, APP for respondent no.1, State.
Mr. J.S. Chandnani, Advocate for respondent no.2.
CORAM :- SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED :- 17th FEBRUARY, 2017.
P.C. :-
1). Mr. Warunjikar, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner states that, the complaint in the trial Court is finally disposed off and the petitioner stands acquitted. In view thereof, the petition has become infructuous. The same is accordingly disposed off.
(SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J)
Shri. Haridas Gopal Shukla
State of Maharashtra
R.P. Sondurbaldota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
