In a writ petition, the court accepted counsel's statement that the underlying dispute was settled in the trial court, rendering the petition infructuous, and disposed of the matter accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Rane
Friday, 17.2.2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1505 OF 2003
Shri. Bhalchandra V. Datey and Ors.
…..Petitioners
V/s.
Mrs. Kalpana A. Sahu and Ors.
…..Respondents
Mr. Gawaal Padavi i/by. Mr. Nitin V. Gangal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mrs. N.S. Jain, APP for respondent, State.
CORAM :- SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED :- 17th FEBRUARY, 2017.
P.C. :-
1). Mr. Padavi, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner
states that the dispute between the parties is already settled in the trial Court. In view of the statement, the petition has become infructuous. The same is accordingly disposed off.
(SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J)
Shri. Bhalchandra V. Datey and Ors.
Mrs. Kalpana A. Sahu and Ors.
R.P. Sondurbaldota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
