The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 369 of 2003 for default due to the non-appearance of the petitioner and his advocate on the scheduled date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssk 1/1 WP 369/03-16/2/17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 369 of 2003
Mr. R. Charles Raj … Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra & ors. … Respondents
None for the petitioner. Mr. S. R. Agarkar, A.P.P. for the State/respondent no.1.
Coram : Smt. R. P. SondurBaldota, J. Date : 16th February, 2017
P.C. :
Though the petition is adjourned to today for dismissal, the petitioner and his advocate are absent. The petition is dismissed for default.
[Smt. R. P. SondurBaldota, J.]
R. Charles Raj
The State of Maharashtra
R. P. SondurBaldota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
