The petitioner failed to appear in court on two occasions. The High Court observed that the petitioner was not keen to pursue the petition and dismissed it for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
31wp705-16.odt
spb/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 705 OF 2016
M/s. Reva Process Engravers … Petitioner.
The State of Maharashtra & 5 Ors. … Respondents. ---
None for the Petitioner. Ms. Kavita Solunke, AGP for the State.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE AND P.R. BORA, JJ.
DATE : 08th FEBRUARY, 2017 P.C. :
None appears on behalf of the Petitioner. Even in the morning session, when the matter was called out, neither the petitioner nor his counsel was present. It appears that the Petitioner is not keen in pursuing this matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
1/1
Borey
M/s. Reva Process Engravers
The State of Maharashtra
V. M. Kanade
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
