The High Court of Bombay disposed of Writ Petition No. 1173 of 2014 based on the parties' amicable settlement and consent terms filed between the petitioners and Respondent No. 1.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP. 1173-14
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 1173 OF 2014
Popatrao Jadhav & Ors. … Petitioners Vs. RR Builders & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Madhav Jamdar, for the Petitioners.
Mr. Dharam Sharma a/w Uma Sharba i/b Dharam & Co., for Respondent No. 1.
Mr. Abhay Patki, AGP for Respondent No. 6.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & P. R. BORA, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 6, 2017 PC.
. The parties have amicably settled the dispute and they have tendered the consent terms. The consent terms filed are between the Petitioners and Respondent No. 1. Consent terms are signed by the Petitioners and Respondent No. 1 and their respective advocates. The undertakings given by both the parties in the consent terms are accepted. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of consent terms. Needless to state that those, who are not parties to the consent terms, will not be bound by these consent terms.
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Popatrao Jadhav & Ors.
RR Builders & Ors.
V. M. Kanade
P. R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
