The court allowed and disposed of a notice of motion by recalling an impugned order dismissing a writ petition for want of prosecution and restoring the writ petition to the file.
Notice of Motion allowed and disposed of; impugned order recalled; writ petition restored.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NMW. 484-16
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION No. 484 OF 2016 IN
WRIT PETITION No. 1116 OF 2014
Mr. Ramavadh S. Rajbhar … Petitioner Vs.
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. & Ors. … Respondents ***
Ms. Daksha Shah, the Applicant. None for the Respondent.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & P. R. BORA, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 6, 2017 PC.
. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant. None appears on behalf of the Respondents. Affidavit of service is already filed on record. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the motion, the impugned order dismissing the petition for want of prosecution is recalled and writ petition is restored to the file. Notice of motion is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and is accordingly disposed of.
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ms. Daksha Shah
V. M. Kanade
P. R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
