This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
wp 63.17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.63 OF 2017
M/s R.G. Sanap Construction Company through its Proprietor Mr. R.G. Sanap Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents
Mr.V.R. Dhorde advocate for the petitioner
Mr. S.B. Yawalkar, Assistant Govt. pleader for Respondent No.1 Mr. D.B. Bakshi advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 5
CORAM : V.M. KANADE &
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ
(Date : 17th January, 2017.)
PER COURT :-
1 Counsel appearing on behalf petitioners, on instructions
submits that, the order of black-listing the petitioner has been withdrawn, which is already taken on record and therefore, he seeks leave to withdraw the petition, on instructions from the petitioner.
2 Petition is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of.
(SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J) (V.M. KANADE, J)
vbd
M/s R.G. Sanap Construction Company
The State of Maharashtra
V.M. Kanade
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
