The petitioner sought withdrawal of the Public Interest Litigation on grounds of infructuousness by efflux of time. The court permitted the withdrawal and disposed of the petition.
Leave was granted to withdraw the petition and the matter was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
Public Interest Litigation No. 03 of 2017
District : Beed
Suresh s/o. Bibhishan Kale,
Age : 40 years,
Occupation : Agriculture &
Social Work,
R/o. Dhangar Jawalaka,
Taluka Patoda, District Beed. .. Petitioner.
versus
The State of Maharashtra,
Through its Secretary,
Rural Development Department,
Mantralaya, Mumbai,
& 06 others. .. Respondents.
...........
Mr. Mahesh S. Bhosale, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. A.B. Girase, Government Pleader, for respondent nos.01, 03, 04 and 07.
...........
CORAM : V.M. KANADE &
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 16TH JANUARY 2017
ORAL ORDER :
The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition on the
ground that it has become infructuous by efflux of time.
02.The Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and is
disposed of.
( Sangitrao S. Patil ) ( V.M. Kanade )
JUDGE JUDGE
puranik / PIL3.17
Suresh Kale
The State of Maharashtra
V.M. Kanade
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court