A writ petition was disposed of by the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad, directing the respondent to consider a proposal submitted by the petitioner within ten weeks on merits and in accordance with law.
The petitioner's proposal dated 29.12.2012 be considered by the respondent within ten weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 12853/16
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.12853 OF 2016
Pravin Sudhir Avasarmal.
...Petitioner..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri Ajay G. Talhar, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri S.B. Joshi, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 2.
.....
CORAM: V.M. KANADE & SANGITRAO S.PATIL,JJ. DATE: 17.01.2017
ORDER :
This petition is disposed of by directing the
respondent no.2 to consider the proposal dated 29.12.2012
submitted by the petitioner within ten weeks on merits
and in accordance with law. With this direction, the
petition is disposed of. No costs.
(SANGITRAO S.PATIL, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)
ndk/ c1711729.odt
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the proposal submitted by the petitioner is to be considered on merits within ten weeks.
Pravin Sudhir Avasarmal
The State of Maharashtra
V.M. Kanade
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court