Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition after its proposal to the District Deputy Registrar was dismissed. The court allowed the withdrawal with liberty to challenge the said order.
The writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to challenge the dismissal order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 545/17
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.545 OF 2017
Rasul S/o Babaji Patel. ...Petitioner..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri Arvind G. Ambetkar, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri V.M. Kagne, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3.
.....
CORAM: V.M. KANADE & SANGITRAO S.PATIL,JJ.
DATE: 17.01.2017
ORDER :
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner submits that in view of dismissal of the
proposal submitted by the petitioner to the District
Deputy Registrar, he seeks leave to withdraw the petition
with liberty to challenge the said order. The petition
is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(SANGITRAO S.PATIL, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)
ndk/ c1711736.odt
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition can be withdrawn with liberty to challenge the dismissal order.
Rasul S/o Babaji Patel
The State of Maharashtra
V.M. Kanade
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court