Petitioner sought writ relief stating he was not absorbed in the Government. During pendency, it was established he had been absorbed. Petition dismissed as infructuous.
Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous; Rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) WP No. 5273/2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 5273 OF 2006
SANJIV BHAURAO GULWE
VERSUS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS.
Mr. S.S. Chaudhari, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. S.B. Joshi, A.G.P. for the State.
CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA &
SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.
Dated : 18-08-2017. ***
PER COURT :-
states that during the pendency of this petition, his client has been already absorbed by the Government in some other Department. Thus, on that count he does not want to press this petition.
(2) WP No. 5273/2006
the position that the petitioner has been already absorbed in some other Department. His statement is accepted.
( SUNIL K. KOTWAL) ( R.D. DHANUKA) JUDGE JUDGE
vdd/
Sanjiv Bhaurao Gulwe
State of Maharashtra
R.D. Dhanuka
Sunil K. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
