Court allowed an application for substituting a legal representative in the name of the second appellant and ordered the necessary amendments.
Application made absolute allowing substitution of legal representative; amendment to be carried out within one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) CA No. 3287/2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3287 OF 2014
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1310 OF 2009
JAWAHAR ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. SHRIRAMPUR VERSUS VIMAL SUDARSHAN BAFNA
Mr. Mangesh Jadhav, holding for Mr. S.P. Shah, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. R.L. Kutte holding for Mr. V.R. Dhorde, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA & SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.
Dated : 18-08-2017.
PER COURT :-
respondent has no objection if the applicants are allowed to substitute the present applicant No. 2A-1 for the original appellant No.2A as legal representative. His statement is accepted.
in terms of prayer Clause-A of the application.
(2) CA No. 3287/2014
( SUNIL K. KOTWAL) ( R.D. DHANUKA) JUDGE JUDGE
vdd/
JAWAHAR ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. SHRIRAMPUR
VIMAL SUDARSHAN BAFNA
R.D. DHANUKA
SUNIL K. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
