The petitioner challenged the cancellation of admission to a postal D.Ed. Course. The bench observed that the same issue was already conclusively decided in a companion Writ Petition No.610/2006.
The writ petition was allowed and the rule was made absolute in terms of the prayer clause.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Writ Petition No.2232/2006
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2232 OF 2006
Panchashila Bhaskar Bansode Age 35 years, Occu. Service, R/o Marwadi Galli, Pragati Colony, Gangapur, Taluka Gangapur, District Aurangabad.
… PETITIONER
VERSUS
Writ Petition No.2232/2006
2
Shri A.S. Kale, Advocate holding for Shri S.B. Talekar, Advocate for petitioner Shri S.B. Joshi, A.G.P. for respondents No.1 to 4 Shri D.R. Kale Patil, Advocate for respondent No.5
CORAM: R.D. DHANUKA AND SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ. DATED: 16th August, 2017.
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER R.D. DHANUKA, J.):
Writ Petition No.2232/2006
3
ORDER
Writ Petition is allowed. Rule is made absolute in terms of
prayer clause (A) of the Writ Petition. No order as to costs.
(SUNIL K. KOTWAL) (R.D. DHANUKA) JUDGE JUDGE
fmp/
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition challenging the cancellation of admission to a D.Ed. course should be heard afresh or disposed of by following a companion judgment.
Whether the petitioner should be granted admission to the postal D.Ed. Course.
Whether the impugned order cancelling the admission should be quashed based on a prior judgment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ Petition No.610/2006Followed¶2
Panchashila Bhaskar Bansode
The State of Maharashtra
The Director of Education, M.S., Pune
The Deputy Director of Education, Aurangabad
The Director, Maharashtra Educational Research & Training Institute
Dyanprabodhini Shikshan Prasarak Mandal
R.D. DHANUKA
SUNIL K. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
