Disposed
Manoj Sethia v. Union of India and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/504/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Nil
What did the court decide?
petition allowed to be withdrawn
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
ssk 1/1 WP 504-17 -8/2/17
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶3
WRIT PETITION NO. 504 OF 2017
¶4
Manoj Sethia … Petitioner vs.
¶5
Union of India (CBI) and anr. … Respondents
¶6
Mr. Ninad Muzumdar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. R. Agarkar, A.P.P. for the State/respondent no.2.
¶7
Coram : Smt. R. P. SondurBaldota, J. Date : 8th February, 2017
¶8
P.C. :
¶9
- Not on board. Taken on board at the instance of the petitioner.
¶10
- Mr. Muzumdar, the learned advocate for the petitioner states that he has instructions to withdraw the petition. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn.
¶11
[Smt. R. P. SondurBaldota, J.]
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Manoj Sethia
- respondent
Union of India (CBI)
Coram
AI extract
R. P. SondurBaldota
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court