2 The petitioner seeks review of the order on as many as 18 grounds stated at grounds (a) to (r). At grounds (a) and (b), the petitioner claims that she had kept an additional affidavit to be filed which was not taken on record. There is nothing on record to indicate that the petitioner had kept such an affidavit ready for filing in the court. As regards grounds (c), (d), (e) and (f), the same relate to the dispute between the petitioner and her parents-in-law, which was not part of the writ petition and the order impugned in the writ petition. Grounds (g), (h) and (i) relate to certain decisions mentioned at ground (g), which were not cited before the court. Therefore, there cannot be review of the order on the arguments that had not been advanced. Grounds (j) and (k) are in the nature of further additional submissions on the merits of the petition. Grounds (l), (m) and (n) raise a contention that this court ought to have appreciated the submission of the petitioner in a different way. That also cannot be a ground for review under the Code of Civil Procedure. As regards ground (o), the
