Disposed
Kamal Satyaprakash Jajoo v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCAPL/48/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
48-17 -8/2/17 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssk 1/1 APL 48-17 -8/2/17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 48 OF 2017
Kamal S. Jajoo
… Applicant
vs.
The State of Maharashtra & anr. … Respondents
Mr. Prathamesh Kamat a/w Devang Khira i/by Mr. Jayesh R. Patel, Advocate for the applicant.
Ms. Anamika Malhotra, A.P.P. for the State/respondent no.1. Mr. O. A. Das, Advocate for respondent no.2.
Coram : Smt. R. P. SondurBaldota, J. Date : 8th February, 2017
P.C. :
After the application is partly argued Mr. Kamat, the learned advocate for the applicant, on instructions, seeks to withdraw the same. The application is allowed to be withdrawn.
[Smt. R. P. SondurBaldota, J.]
Kamal S. Jajoo
The State of Maharashtra
R. P. SondurBaldota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court