The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous because it had no substantial purpose. No operative order granting relief was detailed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 4877 OF 2016
Marathawada Sarva Shramik Sangatana Trade Union Center, Parbhani
....Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
....Respondents.
Mr. P.V. Barde, Advocate for petitioner. Mrs. M.A. Deshpande, AGP for respondent/State.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ.
DATED : August 22, 2017.
PER COURT :
petition has rendered infructuous.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.] [SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.]
ssc/
Marathawada Sarva Shramik Sangatana Trade Union Center, Parbhani
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Shantanu S. Kemkar
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
