None appeared for the petitioner at the hearing. Since the matter was listed for dismissal and the petitioner was absent, the Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
204 wp 4077-99.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4077 OF 1999
Tukaram Dnyanoba Pawar & Others ..Petitioners
v/s. The Manager, Yervada Prison Press, Pune ..Respondents
None for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent.
CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. DATED : 20th JUNE, 2017.
P.C.
for the petitioner on the last two dates of hearings. Today, even though the matter was listed under the caption of “For Dismissal” , none appears for the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
1 of 1
pps
Tukaram Dnyanoba Pawar & Others
The Manager, Yervada Prison Press, Pune
Anuja PrabhuDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
