Petition challenging interim order against respondent joining service as Traffic Inspector was dismissed as withdrawn due to respondent's superannuation. Judge did not go into merits.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902 wp 3834-17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3834 OF 2017
Divisional Controller, MSRTC, Raigad & Ors.
..Petitioners
v/s.
Dattatraya Shankarrao Deshmukh ..Respondent
Mr. Yashodeep Deshmukh for the Petitioner. Mr. Ratnesh Mishra for the Respondent No.1.
CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. DATED : 20th JUNE, 2017.
P.C.
January, 2017 whereby the learned Member of the Industrial Court, Thane had held that the petitioner was engaged in Unfair Labour Practice under item 3 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 and directed to allow the respondent to join at Karjat Depot as Traffic Inspector by keeping in abeyance the transfer order dated 2nd December, 2016.
1 of 2
pps
902 wp 3834-17.doc
the age of superannuation.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
2 of 2
pps
Divisional Controller, MSRTC, Raigad & Ors.
Dattatraya Shankarrao Deshmukh
Anuja Prabhudessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
