Dismissed
Maharashtra State Road Transport Cor. v. Shri. Ramakant Chintu Sarfare
Bombay HCWP/579/2003
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner's petition dismissing for default due to non-appearance.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
209_wp_579_2003.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.579 OF 2003
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation
...Petitioner
Versus
Shri Ramakant Chintu Sarfare ...Respondent
None for the Petitioner.
CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. DATED : 19th JUNE, 2017.
P.C.:-
under the caption of dismissal. It is seen that the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
Megha
1/1
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation
Shri Ramakant Chintu Sarfare
Anuja Prabhu Dessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court