Dr.Suhas Murlidhar Rao and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
388/03-9/2/17 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssk 1/1 WP 388/03-9/2/17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 388 OF 2003
Dr. Suhas Murlidhar Rao & anr. … Petitioners
vs.
The State of Maharashtra & ors. … Respondents
None for the petitioners. Ms. Pallavi Dabholkar, A.P.P. for the State/respondent no.1.
Coram : Smt. R. P. SondurBaldota, J. Date : 9th February, 2017
P.C. :
Though the petition is adjourned to today for dismissal, the petitioners and their advocate are absent. The petition is dismissed for default.
[Smt. R. P. SondurBaldota, J.]
Dr. Suhas Murlidhar Rao
The State of Maharashtra
R. P. SondurBaldota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court