In this writ petition, no appearance was made on behalf of the petitioners on the date of the hearing. The High Court dismissed the petition in default as it appeared the petitioners were not interested in prosecuting the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2764 OF 2014
Kanchan Kothari and ors … Petitioners V/s. Union of India and ors … Respondents
None for the Petitioners. Mrs. A.S. Pai, APP for the Respondent State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 27th NOVEMBER, 2017.
P.C. :
None appears for the petitioners. On the last time i.e. 19th September, 2016, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners. It seems
that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. The same is dismissed in default.
[DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
1/1
Kanchan Kothari and ors.
Union of India and ors.
Ranjit More
Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
