The High Court granted leave to the appellant to withdraw his criminal appeal and writ petition. Both appeals were dismissed as withdrawn without the court adjudicating on the merits.
Leave granted to withdraw appeal and petition; appeals dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(39, 64) APEAL 520 OF 2017.odt
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.520 OF 2017
Bharat Khandu Patil … Appellant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra … Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 897 OF 2017 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.520 OF 2017.
| Abhijit Pradip Khandagale | .. | Applicant/intervener. |
|---|---|---|
| In the matter between. | ||
| Bharat Khandu Patil | … | Appellant. |
| V/s. | ||
| The State of Maharashtra | … | Respondents |
ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2486 OF 2017 Bharat Khandu Patil … Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra … Respondents
1/3
(39, 64) APEAL 520 OF
2017.odt
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 311 OF 2017 IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2486 OF 2017.
Abhijit Pradip Khandagale .. Applicant/intervener.
In the matter between.
| Bharat Khandu Patil | … | Petitioner. |
|---|---|---|
| V/s. | ||
| The State of Maharashtra | … | Respondents |
Mr. A. P. Mundargi, Senior Advocate i/by S. P. Kadam for the Appellant and Petitioner i.e. in Appeal and Petition. Mr.A. R. Kapadnis, APP for the Respondent State in appeal, petitioner and all applications. Mr. Aniket U. Nikam i/by Aashish Satpute, for the applicant/intervener in both the applications.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE &
DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 27th NOVEMBER, 2017.
P.C. :
1] Mr. Mundargi, learned Senior Advocate, having taken instructions from the instructing Attorney, seeks leave to withdraw the appeal as well as the petition with liberty to raise ground of applicability of MCOC Act before the trial Court.
2/3
2017.odt
the matter and all points and contentions raised by the parties are expressly kept open.
5] In the event, if the petitioner /appellant raises objection regarding applicability of MCOC Act, the trial Court, shall decide the same on its own merits.
3/3
Bharat Khandu Patil
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
