Petitioner sought liberty to withdraw the writ petition on the ground that nothing survived. The court accepted the statement and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 2031 of 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Writ Petition No. 2031 of 2006
Rajendra s/o Bhagawant Shintre. .. Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Others. .. Respondents.
Shri. R.S. Deshmukh, Advocate, for petitioner.
Shri. Y.G. Gujarathi, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
Coram: R.D. DHANUKA & SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ. Date : 11 AUGUST 2017
ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks liberty to withdraw the petition on the ground that nothing survives in the petition. The statement is accepted and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. No order as to cost.
Sd/- Sd/- (SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.) (R.D. DHANUKA, J.)
rsl
Rajendra s/o Bhagawant Shintre
The State of Maharashtra
R.D. DHANUKA
SUNIL K. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
