Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition as the underlying civil suit was disposed of amicably. The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Writ Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 184 OF 2015
MR. NAGUESH RAGHUNATH PRABHUDESAI (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES AND ANR., Versus
MR. SAKHARAM DATTARAM PALNI AND 13 ORS.,
... Petitioners
... Respondents
Mr. P. Redkar, Advocate for the petitioners.
Coram:C. V. BHADANG, J.
Date:12th January, 2017
P.C.
The learned Counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, states that the parties have amicably settle the dispute and Regular Civil Suit No.79/2011, out of which, the present petition arises, has been disposed of. The learned Counsel, therefore, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition as it has become infructuous. Accordingly, Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
C. V. BHADANG, J.
SMA
Mr. Naguesh Raghnath Prabudesai (since deceased) through his legal representatives
Mr. Sakharam Dattaram Palni and 13 Ors.
C. V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
