Mr. Rajendra @ Raj Biliye., v. Mr. Atish Lotlikar and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court awarded additional time to deposit the balance amount and disposed of the criminal revision application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 11 OF 2017
IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 62 OF 2016
MR. RAJENDRA @ RAJ BILIYE., ... Applicant Versus MR. ATISH LOTLIKAR AND ANR., ... Respondents
Adv. Rohan Pandurang Desai for the Applicant. Adv. Carlos Alvares Ferreira for Respondent no.1
Coram:C. V. BHADANG, J.
Date:11th January, 2017
P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Time to deposit the balance amount is extended by a period of one week.
C. V. BHADANG, J.
ap/-
MR. RAJENDRA @ RAJ BILIYE.
MR. ATISH LOTLIKAR AND ANR.
C. V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court