Dismissed

Shri Purushottam B. Gaude, Thr. Presently in Custody, Thr. His Next Friend Mr. Minu Gaude. v. Vpk Urban Co-Op. Credit Society Ltd.,Rep. Herein by Its Rec. Officer,Mr. Babani Anant Gaude and Anr.

Bombay HC11 Jan 2017CRIR/6/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CrR no. 6 of 2016 was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant had not appeared on behalf of himself for several dates. The applicant was previously convicted for cheque dishonour.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Revision Application dismissed for want of prosecution.

Shri Purushottam B. Gaude, Thr. Presently in Custody, Thr. His Next Friend Mr. Minu Gaude. v. Vpk Urban Co-Op. Credit Society Ltd.,Rep. Herein by Its Rec. Officer,Mr. Babani Anant Gaude and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Shri Purushottam B. Gaude, Thr. Presently in Custody, Thr. His Next Friend Mr. Minu Gaude. v. Vpk Urban Co-Op. Credit Society Ltd.,Rep. Herein by Its Rec. Officer,Mr. Babani Anant Gaude and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Nitin Yeshwant Patekar. Vs Village Panchayat Dhargal, Thr. Its Sarpanch and 5 Ors.

Belarmin Fernandes and Anr., Vs Roque Philip Fernandes and 7 Ors.

Atul Ashok Bicholkar., Vs the State of Goa, Thr. Police Inspector, Vasco Police Station, Vasco.

Mr. Rajendra @ Raj Biliye., Vs Mr. Atish Lotlikar and Anr.

City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. (Cidco) through Their S.K.Karhad., Vs Rashmi Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by Their Director Shri N.P. Vasu Nair.

City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. (Cidco), Thr. Aut. Pranik v. Mul., Vs Rashmi Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by Their Director Shri N. P. Vasu Nair.