This petition sought a direction to the Respondents to repay the accumulated Provident Fund deposit and interest amount for a 5-year scheme that had expired. The court allowed the petition.
Direction to Respondents to repay the accumulated PF deposit and interest expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25-wp-172-2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.172 OF 2015
Baban Krishna Dhawre
...Petitioner
vs.
Mumbai (Bombay) Port Trust and Others
...Respondents
Ms. S. Khan i/b. Mr. S. More, for the Petitioner. Mr. Arsh Misra i/b. M.V. Kini & Co., for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mrs. Uma Palsuledesai, for Respondent No. 5.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR &
M. S. SONAK, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 28, 2017
P.C.:
. Through this Petition, the Petitioner has claimed
following relief.
“(b) That this Court be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 to direct the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 to repay/ reimbursed the entire accumulated and accrued amount of deposit in P.F. Account which was deposited on 25/05/11 under a scheme vide P.F. A/c. No. E-17836 for 5 years, since 2011 till 2016, by Petitioner along with the interest accrued and arrived therein till today; thereby allow the Petitioner to withdraw the entire amount accumulated till today in the scheme of retention of Provident Fund money kept for under 5 years scheme deposited by Petitioner with Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 therein.”
2. The learned counsel for the Respondents submit that
the period of the scheme has expired and as such the Petitioner is entitled to get the entire amount as per his entitlement.
1/2
Vishal Parekar
25-wp-172-2015.doc
Petition can be disposed of by directing the Respondents to make payment to the Petitioner as per his entitlement as expeditiously as possible.
2/2
Vishal Parekar
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners claim for repayment of accumulated Provident Fund deposit and interest with expiry of the scheme period should be allowed.
Whether the Respondents are directed to make the payment expeditiously.
Baban Krishna Dhawre
Mumbai (Bombay) Port Trust
Shantanu S. Kemkar
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
