Allowed

Mr. Prakash Dayaram Yeolkar v. the Headmaster, K. K. Wagh Vidyabhavan and Ors.

Bombay HC22 Jun 2017WP/8598/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of several writ petitions by directing respondents to grant and revise pay scales to petitioners appointed as Full-time Librarian, conforming with Fifth and Sixth Pay Commissions. Benefits were ordered to be released within three months.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents to grant pay scale to petitioners as Full-time Librarian and revise as per Fifth Pay and Sixth Pay Commission; benefits within three months.

Mr. Prakash Dayaram Yeolkar Vs the… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

2-wp-8598-2016.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.8598 OF 2016 WITH

¶4

WRIT PETITION NOS.2384, 2395, 5046, 5047, 5048, 5050, 5057, 5090, 8599, 8600 AND 8601 OF 2016

¶5

Prakash Dayaram Yeolkar and Others vs.

¶6

...Petitioners

¶7

The Headmaster,

¶8

K.K. Wagh Vidyabhavan and Others

¶9

...Respondents

¶10

Ms. Indrayani Koparkar, for the Petitioners Ms. Aparna Vhatkar, AGP for the Respondent-State.

¶11

CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & M. S. SONAK, JJ.

¶12

DATE : JUNE 22, 2017

¶13

P.C.:

¶14

. Parties through their counsel.

¶15

The learned counsel for the parties submits that the

¶16

question involved in this case has already been answered by the various Division Benches of this Court in various matters including in the case of “Sadanand Pandurang Mali vs. Dy.

¶17

Director of Education and Ors.” in Writ Petition No. 7963 of 2012

¶18

vide order dated 23^rd December, 2013, as also in the case of

¶19

“ Dhanshree Raosaheb Patil nee Kumari Bharti Nabhiraj patil

¶20

vs. The Dy. Director and Ors. ” in Writ Petition No. 12242 of 2015

1/2

Vishal Parekar

2-wp-8598-2016.doc

vide order dated 8^th July, 2016 and in Writ Petition Nos. 5938 of 1998, 1622 of 2000, 4424 of 2003 and 177 of 2011.

¶25

This has also not been disputed by the learned counsel for the parties that the order passed in Writ Petition No. 177 of 2011 along with the companion Writ Petitions were challenged by the Respondent-State before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in S.L.P. (Civil Appeal) No. 9732 of 2012 and the said Appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court vide order dated 24^th January, 2014.

¶26

In view of the aforesaid, in terms of the various orders referred to above, we dispose of the Petitions directing the Respondents to grant pay scale to the Petitioners from their respective appointments as “Full-time Librarian” and revise the same as per their entitlement regarding Fifth Pay and Sixth Pay Commission.

¶27

The benefits in term of this order be released in favour of the Petitioners as expeditiously as possible and in any event within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶28

Accordingly all the Writ Petitions are disposed of.

¶29

2/2

¶30

Vishal Parekar

Mr. Prakash Dayaram Yeolkar v. the Headmaster, K. K. Wagh Vidyabhavan and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Prakash Dayaram Yeolkar v. the Headmaster, K. K. Wagh Vidyabhavan and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Hughes and Hughes Chem Ltd. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Anita Fernandes and Anr. Vs Sonya Chikhalikar and Anr.

Smt. Aarti Ashok Rawate Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Smt. Ranjana Shivaji Jadhav Vs Shri. Shivaji Gangadhar Jadhav and Anr.

Shri. Shankar Ragho Kumbhar (Deceased) Throug HEIRS-1 Shri.Naresh Ramchandra Kumbhar and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra (through Special Land Acquisition Officer)

Zoom Developers Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.