Appellants were granted leave to withdraw their appeal without costs in an ordinary original civil appeal. The Notice of Motion was disposed of subsequently.
Leave to withdraw the appeal with liberty to challenge the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
29-app-28-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO.28 OF 2017 IN
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1907 OF 2011
IN
SUIT NO.3851 OF 1990 WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.624 OF 2017
Siddhivinayak Enterprises and Another vs. Mathurabai Kisan Koli and Another
...Appellants
...Respondents
Ms. Manjiri Shah a/w. R. Kapadia i/b. Thakore Jariwala and Associates, for the Appellants.
Mr. Rahul Soman a/w. Ms. Devyani Deshmukh i/b. M/s. Solomon & Co., for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & M. S. SONAK, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 28, 2017
P.C.:
. After arguing for some time, the learned counsel for the Appellants seeks leave to withdraw the Appeal with liberty to the Appellants to challenge the impugned order dated 30th September, 2016 before the appropriate Forum at the appropriate stage, in case the Suit is decreed against the Appellants.
(M. S. SONAK, J.)
(SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
1/1
Vishal Parekar
Siddhivinayak Enterprises
Mathurabai Kisan Koli
Shantanu S. Kemkar
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
