Disposed

Subhash Umashankar Jirawankar and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC28 Aug 2017WP/10628/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking an additional financial increment for the petitioners. The Court directed the authorities to consider a detailed representation with supporting documents within four months and to process the claim in accordance with the relevant government policy.

What did the court decide?

Directions to the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Hingoli, and respondent nos. 2 & 3 to consider a detailed representation with supporting documents and decide the additional increment within

Subhash Umashankar Jirawankar and Others Vs… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

- 1 -

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

 WRIT PETITION NO.10628/2017

¶5

Subhash Umashankar Jirawankar & others.

¶6

...Petitioners..

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Maharashtra & others.
...Respondents...

¶9

 .....

¶10

Shri Shivkumar K. Mathpati, Advocate for petitioners.
Shri A.R. Kale, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 7.
Shri S.B. Ghute, Advocate for respondent nos.8 & 9.

¶11

 .....

¶12

CORAM: SHANTANU S. KEMKAR &
 NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ.
DATE: 28.08.2017

¶13

ORDER :

¶14

1]Heard learned counsel for the parties. With

¶15

their consent, the petition is taken up for final
disposal.

¶16

2]The grievance of the petitioners is that they

¶17

are entitled for benefit of one additional increment as

¶18

per policy dated 12.12.2000 of the State Government, but

¶19

the respondent nos.8 and 9 are not forwarding the
proposal to the respondent nos.2 to 4 for grant of said

¶20

WP 10628/17

¶21

additional increment to the petitioners.

¶22

3]We find that the petitioners have already

¶23

submitted a representation before the Chief Executive
Officer, Zilla Parishad, Hingoli.

¶24

4]In the circumstances, we dispose of this

¶25

petition with liberty to the petitioners to submit a

¶26

further detailed representation with supporting documents
before the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad,
Hingoli. On receipt of such a representation, the said
authority shall consider the same and shall forward its
report / proposal to the competent authority i.e.
respondent nos.2 and 3.

¶27

5]On receipt of said report / proposal, the

¶28

respondent nos.2 and 3 shall examine the same and shall

¶29

take appropriate decision taking into consideration the
aforesaid policy dated 12.12.2000 and in accordance with

¶30

law, as also the observations made by Division Bench of this Court in the case of Suresh Raghoba Bhowate v. State of Maharashtra & others in Writ Petition No.6116/2014

¶31

alongwith connected petitions decided at Nagpur Bench on
16.12.2014 as also the order dated 29.6.2016 passed in

¶32

the case of Dhanraj Shivaji Vani v. The State of

¶33

WP 10628/17

¶34

Maharashtra & others in Writ Petition No.6382/2016

¶35

alongwith connected petitions decided at Bombay.

¶36

6]Let the entire exercise, as aforesaid, be
completed by the Chief Executive Officer as also the
respondent nos.2 and 3 within four months from the date
of receipt of copy of this order.

¶37

7]With the aforesaid directions, the petition is
disposed of. No costs.

¶38

 (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)

¶39

ndk/ c28817.doc

Subhash Umashankar Jirawankar and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subhash Umashankar Jirawankar and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dayanand Bhikaji Sirsathe Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Laxmikant Sudhakar Kulkarni and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Mahesh Daulatrao Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Dr. Sagar Ravindra Kolhe and Another Vs Union of India and Another

Kavita Sushil Bhale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shilpa Rangnathrao Shirsath Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others