The High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad disposed of a writ petition concerning the allotment of a dealership. The court held that no further steps survived in the petition following a cessation in allotment actions, but allowed future participation if a fresh advertisement were issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp2532.14
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2532 OF 2014
Dr. Sagar s/o Ravindra Kolhe & anr. ..PETITIONERS
VERSUS
Union of India & anr.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr H.D. Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner; Mr Alok Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.1
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ.
DATE : 28th August, 2017
P.C.
It has not been disputed by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that in pursuance to the impugned advertisement no further steps have been taken in regard to allotment of the dealership for retail outlet on Solapur – Dhule National High way at Kasabkheda Phata.
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
amj
Dr. Sagar s/o Ravindra Kolhe & anr.
Union of India & anr.
Shantanu S. Kemkar
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
