The petitioner sought leave to withdraw Writ Petition No. 1801 of 2017. The court accepted the prayer and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw petition granted; Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1801.17
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1801 OF 2017
Dayanand s/o Bhikaji Sirsathe ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Mah. & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr D.K. Rajput, Advocate for petitioner; Mrs V.N. Patil-Jadhav , A.G.P. for respondent no.1; Mr U.B. Bondar, Advocate for respondents no.2 to 4
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ.
DATE : 24th August, 2017
P.C.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on written instructions from the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Prayer is accepted. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Written instructions are taken on record and marked as Exhibit “X” for identification.
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
(SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
amj
Dayanand s/o Bhikaji Sirsathe
The State of Mah.
Shantanu S. Kemkar
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
